Enola gay movie site glass
![enola gay movie site glass enola gay movie site glass](https://www.wright-bros.com//media/catalog/product/cache/aa1e99c7c52b59ff91c9edb49f6532be/1/7/17708_2.jpg)
Perhaps, someday, the owner of the document, or Lewis’s survivors, will be magnanimous enough to share a transcript with the National Archives. As we indicated earlier, the current owner of the notebook is unknown-he or she is not named in the news accounts of the 2002 auction and the Christie’s auction website reveals only the amount paid for the item.Īll that we can offer at this point is a transcript of excerpts from Robert Lewis’s log that we have found in previously published sources. Of course, even during this short-lived exhibit, the log was under glass and visitors could only see-depending on how the document was displayed-one or two pages. Is this position a bad joke on the part of the curators? Or a bit of irony? In an exhibition position is, if not everything, almost everything objects very obviously “mean” in relation to what’s around them, how they’re arranged. It’s often said that position is everything in life. Side by side we share these pieces of evidence-awesome and awful presidential power and a president’s personal tantrum. …Next to President Truman’s famous letter attacking Paul Hume, the music critic who attacked the musicianship of his daughter, Margaret, sits the diary kept by a crew member of the Enola Gay…The positioning is curious, and just as I am staring at the Enola Gay logbook, I hear Malcolm Forbes on the videotape say that he thinks of this diary as “human documentation.” Human documentation of an event inhuman in its effects placed next to Truman’s all-too-human letter defending his daughter.
![enola gay movie site glass enola gay movie site glass](http://cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/200414120630-enola-gay-4.jpg)
That same year, writer Lynne Tillman described the rare experience of seeing Lewis’s notebook in an article published in Art In America magazine: Forbes concerning his collection was played in a videotape loop on a television monitor. In 1988, the Forbes Museum in New York City displayed the log in an exhibition entitled “And If Elected: Two Hundred Years of Presidential Elections: An Exhibition for the 1988 Election Year.” The famous notebook was kept in a small room in the gallery along with Malcolm Forbes’s “most unique and important Presidential acquisitions.” In this space, an interview with Mr. The marketing material from Christie’s also quotes directly from the log, though they omit Lewis’s pejorative for the enemy. The New York Times also quoted from the notebook at the time of the 1971 auction. Of all the books that have been written about Hiroshima, it appears that Laurence’s is the only one that quotes directly from the original source.
#ENOLA GAY MOVIE SITE GLASS FULL#
The increasingly high value of Lewis’s original document is understandable-It is the only in-flight, first-hand narrative account of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima, Japan.** But why is it that no full transcription or photocopy of the historically significant log exists for scholars to study? CONELRAD has checked with the Los Alamos National Laboratory, the Library of Congress and the National Archives and none of these agencies has a copy. He was quoted by New York Times reporter Deirdre Carmody at the time as saying that he decided to sell it because “experts in the field have described it as one of the most historical documents of our era, and I don’t know what else to do with it.” The log would be auctioned off two more times in the ensuing years: In 1978 for $85,000 to publisher Malcolm Forbes and in 2002 for $391,000 to an unknown buyer. Perhaps because of the patriotic fervor of the immediate post-war era, or due to his own timidity, Laurence omitted Lewis’s dramatic follow-on question: “What have we done?”Īt some point, Lewis got his notebook back and, on November 24, 1971, he sold it at auction for $37,000. The most famous words from the log that the author chose to excerpt are from the section revealing the co-pilot’s reaction to the explosion: “My God.” Laurence eventually quoted a portion of the material in his 1946 book Dawn Over Zero: The Story of the Atomic Bomb. The journalist could not immediately use Lewis’s descriptions due to security restrictions, so he marked the notebook “hold for top secret clearance” and placed it in a safe deposit box. But after several days, during which he performed some additional writing (dated August 10, 1945), the officer honored his commitment and loaned the notebook to Laurence. Upon the Enola Gay’s safe return to the base at Tinian, Lewis was advised during the debriefing to keep his freelance document to himself. Post-atomic debriefing: Lewis is on the right with clipboard & cigarette